Once a titan of the tech world, Motorola’s story read like a page-turner; full of twists and heart-racing peaks that captured the world’s attention.

Yet, perplexingly, it stumbled, leaving many to ponder, why did Motorola fail? This tale is more than a corporate drama—it’s a labyrinth of decision-making paths where some turns led to dead-ends.

You’re here for answers. You’re in the right place. By the end of this unfolding narrative, you will grasp the pivotal moments that defined Motorola’s journey, from groundbreaking innovation in mobile technology to the sobering realization of missed opportunities and market share decline.

Navigate through Motorola’s business missteps, witness the impact of industry disruption, and understand the repercussions of a market strategy that seemed to zig when others zagged.

We’ll dissect the economic factors, the rise of formidable competitors like Apple and Samsung, and the internal management challenges that collectively scripted a case study in the annals of business cautionary tales.

Motorola – the rise and fall

Back in 1928, brothers Joseph and Paul Galvin acquired a recently bankrupted radio technology and paid only $750 for it. It was Paul who came up with the idea to make radios portable and install them in cars.

The next step was to create portable signal receivers for the police. The success was followed by FM appliances, large-screen TVs, and mobile phones. Motorola even created the very first transceiver to use in space and signed any mobile technology to appear at that time. 

The company entered the mobile phone market in the late 70s and early 80s. Their iconic DynaTAC 8000 appeared in 1984, and it was the very first flip phone the world has seen. They followed up with MicroTAC in 1989, and the world’s smallest and lightest clamshell flip phone StarTAC in 1996. 

It seemed their success has no end. They kept on hiring people and building huge factories, as well as investing in quality solutions. They even managed to establish the Six Sigma standard and ensured that 99,99% of their products had no defects at all. 

The largest mobile phone manufacturer focused on China and followed its opening to international markets in the 80s. It wasn’t easy, but they managed to convince the Chinese government to let them build factories there. This enabled them to cut costs significantly, but the price turned out higher than they thought. Chinese manufacturers were getting familiar with western production standards.

The influence of Motorola was immense. Thousands of Chinese suppliers, some of them even state-owned, adopted Motorola practices. Most of them had second and third-tier suppliers, and one could argue that Motorola played the biggest role in China’s economic growth.

At the time, Motorola was divided into two sub-companies:

Motorola Solutions for communication and Motorola Mobility for mobile phones. They operated fully independently from each other and aligned only on important matters.

The animosity was so significant that engineers from Solutions used rival phones from Qualcomm. As Motorola’s market share dropped, another mobile phone giant was conquering the market. It was Nokia.

By the end of 1997, as Gary Tooker‘s CEO mandate expired, Nokia had become the leading mobile phone producer in the world. Chris Galvin was brought in again to stabilize the situation.

The 1980s were a time of space obsession, and lots of money were invested in space exploration. Communication technologies were key, and the efforts soon gave birth to the Iridium project. The network comprised 77 satellites. It would ensure coverage wherever traditional technology fell short. Wireless phone service was about to connect the entire world.

The technology for these satellites was provided by Motorola, and it was worth $2.6 billion. The project was developed for an entire decade, only to fail miserably in 1998. Iridium could only be used with ultra-expensive phones ($3,000 per piece) and a minute cost of $7. Therefore, Iridium bankrupt after only 9 months, and Motorola had to sell it for only 1% of what it originally cost. 

As if this was not enough, 9-11 happened. These events paired with the SARS scare caused Motorola to lose even $4 billion. Galvin was desperate for solutions and fired 1/3 of the 150,000 workers. Multiple plants were closed, including the main $90 million plant in Harvard, Illinois. This, however, was not enough to save the company.

Chris now invested his hopes in the newest, digital-ready Razr mobile phone. The device was very thin and made almost entirely of metal.

The Razr phones

Unfortunately, Motorola didn’t stick on the market long enough to see the luxurious phone being launched. In 2003, the Galvin family gave up and sold their 3% company share for only $720 million.

Galvin’s leaving might have been premature, as things took a dramatic turn after only three months. Razr was enormously successful, as almost 50 million phones were sold in only two years. In 2004, the market share of Motorola was an incredible $42 billion, and new CEO Ed Zander was celebrating the success of Galvin’s idea. Razr was officially the second-best mobile phone in the world, and one of the 20 best mobile devices to ever be invented. 

However, it didn’t take long for Zander to diminish the success of the company. He made a deal with Silicon Valley genie Steve Jobs (Apple CEO) and created the Motorola Rokr. Rokr had the hardware technology of Motorola and Apple iTunes. As expected, this phone was a total success, but it didn’t break Motorola’s way. The company had neglected all its efforts to keep competition off its way. It had taught the most dangerous and savviest competitor how to make a great phone.

In 2007, Apple discontinued its partnership and launched the very first iPhone. The basis for it was nothing else than Motorola’s Razr.

Zander had made an array of mistakes. For starters, he didn’t engage with China as much as his predecessors and left the division heads to handle the job. China improved its networks to 3G, while Motorola was still producing 2G phones.

In the end, they had to offer their products at steep discounts so that they can stay on the market. Samsung and Huawei used the situation to offer cheaper phones, and they were soon leaders of the Asian market. There was nothing Motorola could do at that point to compete with them.

Zander left the leadership position in 2008. In the year to come, the mobile market share of Motorola had sunk to an incredible 6%. 

The next rescue attempt was by prominent investor Carl Icahn.

He came into the picture in 2007 and purchased 3.6% of the company. The first thing he did is to split the two company divisions into separate firms. 

The new CEO, Sanjay Jha, focused on Android phone production, which proved to be a good move. Their Droid phone was acquired by Verizon and soon sold much better than iPhone. Google used the opportunity to purchase the Mobility division, this time for $12.5 billion

It was a sweet deal for Google: Motorola would produce their next hit Nexus, and they will get access to their patents and their customer base. All Motorola products released during Google ownership sold well, and Motorola was next acquired by Lenovo for $2,91 billion. In 2014, they tried to conquer the US market with the new Razr. Due to the high price of the phone ($1,500), this attempt was not successful. 

Not long after Google sold Motorola, followed the steps of all departed tech masters, such as SGI, Atari, and Commodore. 

A brief history of why Motorola failed

Motorola didn’t move to 3G

Perhaps its biggest mistake of Motorola was that it didn’t recognize the growth of the 3G industry. Instead, they kept making obsolete 2G devices.

It wasn’t competitive enough

Many experts argue that Motorola lost most of its market share because of low investment in security. At the same time, companies such as Blackberry were taking the role. Blackberry developed software that helps companies communicate safely and securely. 

Blackberry changed the mobile phone market for good. Instead of innovating, Motorola stayed focused on the products it already had.

Soon after, Apple offered consumer devices of its own and pushed even Blackberry aside. Motorola was no longer a bench player – it had left the game completely. 

2-way radios were replaced by mobile phones

With mobile phones becoming accessible to large audiences, Motorola’s 2-way radios became irrelevant.

It wasn’t innovating

Motorola made no innovation for years. It lost its place among the 10 leading US firms, and it dropped to place 34 in 2006. 

It was poorly managed

Motorola changed more leaders in a decade than some companies for their entire existence. Poor management affected the business, and Motorola lost its competitive edge in the market.

Work culture suffered

Motorola’s leading managers didn’t make the effort of controlling all sectors, and let the local leaders do business as they please. The company had no cohesive plan for the handset and network technology. Quite soon, the two divisions were headed in two completely different directions. 

Poor decisions were made

Thanks to Motorola, Chinese companies learned how to produce mobile phones. As a result, there were more and more Asian-produced devices on the US market. 

The Apple deal was also not the smartest move ever. Motorola gave Apple the necessary knowledge on how to produce mobile hardware. 

They focused on quantity over quality

Apple directed all its resources toward the perfect iPhone, while Motorola kept working on several models at the same time. In such a way, Motorola missed valuable opportunities in the cell phone industry.

What can we learn from Motorola’s failure?

The inglorious end of Motorola mobility taught us a few very important lessons. 

Quality is key

Making a great product is not enough. You need to keep improving it and maintaining its success. This will work much better than investing efforts into multiple products or variations all the time. 

Innovation is important

You can only stand out from the competition if you keep innovating, there is no way around it.

Good marketing can be very helpful

Neither Motorola nor Nokia are on the market anymore. The two tech giants had one thing in common: they didn’t invest in marketing as much as they should have. It seemed unimportant at the time, but it is the very reason why both brands are now history footnotes.

Unhealthy work culture

Companies need to invest both time and means into creating a pleasant workspace. The lack of management and healthy working relationships can diminish even the biggest success, such as the one of Motorola.

FAQ On Why Did Motorola Fail

How Did Motorola Lose Its Leading Position in the Mobile Market?

Motorola missed waves in the tech sea. They were slow to shift from analogue to digital, from brick phones to smart devices.

Others raced ahead with smartphones and digital communication standards.

Was the Failure of Motorola Due to Poor Management Decisions?

Absolutely. Leaders at the top made some missteps. They focused on short-term gains over innovation, failing to see the smartphone revolution brewing.

It was a combo of corporate restructuring chaos and taking their eye off the consumer ball.

Did Motorola’s Product Strategy Contribute to Its Downfall?

Yep, it sure did. They were kings with the Razr, but they rested on those laurels too long. The tech world’s fast, and they didn’t keep up.

They lacked in delivering newinnovative products that people craved.

How Did Market Competition Affect Motorola’s Business?

Market competition gave them a rough time. Apple’s iPhone and Samsung’s Galaxy series were like shiny new toys—everyone wanted one.

Motorola… not so much. They struggled to keep up, losing market share and customer interest.

Were There Economic Factors That Led to Motorola’s Failure?

Economic factors always play a part, right? But it was more than just the economy. It’s about spending unsustainably on ventures, like the Iridium satellite project, that sucked resources dry without giving back.

Bad bets in a tumultuous economy can be like pouring cash down the drain.

How did Motorola’s Approach to Innovation Impact Their Success?

In the tech world, innovate or die, and Motorola got that memo too late. Their approach to innovation didn’t pace with the likes of 3G and 4G technologies.

When consumers looked for the latest, Motorola offered them yesterday’s news.

Did Motorola Fail to Predict Consumer Behaviour Changes?

They didn’t just fail to predict; they practically ignored the signs. Consumer preferences shifted towards sleek, multifunctional devices, and Motorola?

They seemed fixed on the old school. Ignoring consumer demand is like turning your back on a tidal wave.

How Significant Were Motorola’s Marketing Failures?

Just look at their counterparts’ ads; they were everywhere. Motorola’s marketing campaigns? Not so much.

A presence in consumers’ minds is paramount in the digital communication industry, and Motorola’s voice lost its strength.

What Role Did Technological Advancements Play in Motorola’s Decline?

Big role! Picture Motorola as a sprinter wearing flip-flops in a race against speedsters in high-tech kicks.

Advancements in mobile technology were rapid; Motorola’s response was sluggish.

Could Motorola Have Avoided Failure with Different Strategic Decisions?

A game of “what if”, huh? With different calls focusing on product developmentR&D investment, and understanding the digital privacy concerns era, sure, there might have been a different tale to tell. Hindsight’s 20/20, isn’t it?


So, we’ve journeyed down the winding road of Motorola’s saga, tackling the burning question: why did Motorola fail? It’s clear, in hindsight, that a cocktail of factors mixed together to write their story. Let’s break it down:

  • Leadership missteps? Check. Those at the helm veered off course.
  • Missed technological tides? Absolutely. The industry didn’t pause for catch-up.
  • Consumer disconnect? You bet. A once-loyal base found new loves.
  • Innovative inertia? Unfortunately so. They needed to sprint but chose to stroll.

This isn’t just about pointing fingers but more about connecting dots. Lessons? Plenty.

  • Keep the innovation pedal to the metal.
  • Listen to the rhythm of the market; it’s music with tempo changes.
  • Know thy consumer—they’re the compass for product strategy.

Ever so often, history lays down a tale rich with insights, teaching that even titans need to dance with change, or risk tumbling from Olympus.

If you liked this article about the failure of Motorola, you might like this one about the Windows phone failure.

Want to know what are the most successful Kickstarter campaigns? You should also check out these articles about why Vine failed, or why MySpace failedentrepreneur podcastsstartup culture, and the best business YouTube channels.


I'm the manager behind the Upcut Studio team. I've been involved in content marketing for quite a few years helping startups grow.